Showing posts with label oddity. Show all posts
Showing posts with label oddity. Show all posts

Thursday, June 2, 2011

Snapped

Seattle attorney charged with keying badly parked cars

Published 10:37 a.m., Wednesday, June 1, 2011
A Seattle attorney accused of keying and leaving threatening notes on improperly parked cars at a downtown parking garage has been charged with malicious mischief.
King County prosecutors claim Ronald Clarke Mattson vandalized at least three cars at Columbia Center, including one parked askew by building security as part of a sting operation.
On March 9, a woman returned to her Ford SUV to find an angry note, written on Washington Athletic Club stationery, left on her windshield. The note’s author – identified by prosecutors as Mattson – suggested the woman “take some parking lessons” and called her an idiot.
Having returned home, the woman realized someone had dragged a key across her car doors, leaving deep scratches, according to charging documents. She contacted Columbia Center security officers, who photographed her car and took custody of the note.
Two days later on March 11, another woman returned to her car in the Columbia Center parking garage to find an angry note on her Volvo station wagon. As in the earlier case, the woman had parked over the stall line.
“Where did you learn how to park, Dweeb!!” the note read, according to charging documents. That note was also penned on Washington Athletic Club stationery.
Seeing that her Volvo had also been keyed, the woman contacted security.
According to charging documents, building security officers hoping to identify the vandal set up a sting operation on March 15. Security officers parked a Pontiac sedan improperly in the area of the garage where the other cars had been keyed.
As surveillance officers looked on, Mattson drove his silver Porsche past the “bait” car, stopped and reversed back by the Pontiac, Seattle Detective John Crumb told the court. Mattson then parked and approached the car.
Security officers later told police Mattson was seen scratching the Pontiac, according to the detective’s statement. A security officer then followed Mattson to the elevator, where they rode to his 45th floor office.
After a series of interactions with security and police officers, Mattson and his attorney met with investigators to discuss the incidents, Crumb said in court documents. The detective claimed Mattson admitted to the vandalism, which prompted about $6,150 worth of repairs.
“Mattson accepted full responsibility for his actions, expressed great remorse and vowed to make amends with his victims,” the detective told the court.
Mattson has been charged with second-degree malicious mischief, a felony punishable by up to 60 days in jail. He has not yet entered a plea to the charge.
Check the Seattle 911 crime blog for more Seattle crime news. Visit seattlepi.com's home page for more Seattle news.
Levi Pulkkinen can be reached at 206-448-8348 or levipulkkinen@seattlepi.com. Follow Levi on Twitter at twitter.com/levipulk.




Thursday, May 26, 2011

Seismologists tried for manslaughter over quake



Seismologists tried for manslaughter over quake
Italian scientists didn't alert public ahead of time, although peers say that's not
possible
By Jeanna Bryner,
5/26/2011


Hundreds attend the state funeral ceremony for v ictims of the April 6, 2009 earthquake, at
piazza d'Armi in L'Aquila, Abruzzo, central Italy.
Earthquake prediction can be a grave, and faulty science, and in the case of Italian
seismologists who are being tried for the manslaughter of the people who died in the
2009 L'Aquila quake, it can have legal consequences.
The group of seven, including six seismologists and a government official, reportedly didn't alert the public ahead of time of the risk of the L'Aquila earthquake, which occurred on April 6 of that year, killing around300 people, according to the U.S. Geological Survey.
But most scientists would agree it's not their fault they couldn't predict the wrath of Mother
Nature."We're not able to predict earthquakes very well at all," John Vidale, a Washington State
seismologist and professor at the University of Washington, told LiveScience.
Even though advances have been made, the day scientists are able to forecast earthquakes
is still "far away," Dimitar Ouzounov, a professor of earth sciences at Chapman University in California, said this month regarding the prediction of the March 11 earthquake in Japan. L'Aquila faults
The decision to try the six members of a committee tasked with determining the risk of
an earthquake in the area (along with a government official) was announced on Wednesday (May 25) by Judge Giuseppe Romano, according to a news article from the American Association for the Advancement of Science.
Some people said the committee should've seen it coming, because of the earthquake swarms that occurred days before the big one struck, Vidale said.
"We get swarms of earthquakes all the time without a big earthquake. There was nothing strange about this swarm to suggest a big earthquake," Vidale said in a telephone
interview.

Regarding the charges against the Italian seismologists, Vidale said "we're offended"
that they are being charged with a crime "for telling the truth." That truth is, he added, there
was nothing to say that the level of danger was enough to warrant any public action.

Talking with Vidale, one gets the impression that predicting an earthquake would take a
miracle, as there are so many unknowns. "One problem is we don't know how much
stress it takes to break a fault," Vidale said. "Second we still don't know how much stress
is down there. All we can do is measure howthe ground is deforming." Not knowing either
of these factors makes it pretty tough to figure out when stresses will get to the point of a
rupture, and an earth-shaking quake, he explained.
To get measurements of the actual stresses, researchers have to drill miles beneath the
surface — an engineering feat on its own — and would only be able to drill a couple places
to put sensors along the fault. (Drilling has been done along the San Andreas fault, but no
one has measured the stress at depth there, Vidale said.)
On top of all that, the L'Aquila region is a particularly complex nut to crack geologically.
While mostly horizontal strike-slip faults, like the San Andreas, are much clearer faults to
analyze, the L'Aquila fault system is complex, with several so-called "normal" faults moving
mostly vertically.
And several tectonic processes are active in the region: The Adria micro-plate is being
subducted under the Apennines from east to west, while at the same time continental
collision is occurring between the Eurasia and Africa plates (responsible for the building of
the Alps).

Digging into the past

With all the downers, earthquake prediction science, it seems, is coming back into fashion
after a lull in the 80s when methods weren't showing any success, Vidale said. The key is
to find some strange phenomenon that occurs before, days before, an earthquake, that
seismologists can recognize. While they haven't found any silver bullet, scientists are digging up data on past earthquakes along fault systems to give them an idea of the probability another will occur.
Even so, probability of an earthquake coming "doesn't help with predictions a day before an
earthquake," Vidale said.
Another method involves detecting evidence of unusual amounts of radon gas in the
atmosphere. Right before an earthquake, the fault may release more gases, including radon.
In fact, Ouzounov and colleagues found such anomalous signatures in the atmosphere
above Japan days before the March 11 quake struck.
No one has ever predicted an earthquake from atmospheric data, and plenty of supposed
earthquake precursors, from weird animal behavior to groundwater flowing the wrong
way, have proven hit-or-miss.
Of the radon gas method, Vidale said, "nowwe're pretty confident that's not reliable."



Follow LiveScience for the latest in science news
5/26/2011

Saturday, May 7, 2011

Friday, January 16, 2009

A mai kedvenc mondatom ....


Get a Voki now!