Monday, July 11, 2011


[Congressional Record: July 5, 2011 (Senate)] [Page S4327-S4328] From the Congressional Record Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov] [DOCID:cr05jy11-37]                                              
       
DEMOCRACY AT RISK IN HUNGARY  

  Mr. CARDIN. 
Mr. President, this week in Budapest there are two events  of particular interest to Americans. First, Hungary has unveiled a  statue of President Ronald Reagan in front of  the U.S. Embassy in honor of his contribution to the goal of ending  communist repression and commemorating the 100th anniversary of his  birth. Second, Hungary dedicated the Lantos Institute, named after Tom  Lantos, our former colleague from the House of Representatives who  worked tirelessly to promote democracy and human rights in the country  of his birth. Former Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice and Secretary  of State Clinton have represented the United States at these respective  events.   These gestures shine a light on Hungary's historic transformation as  well as the close bonds between our two countries. Unfortunately, other  developments in Hungary have cast a dark shadow over what should  otherwise be happy occasions.   Last year, Hungary held elections in which a right-of-center party,  FIDESZ, won a landslide, sweeping out eight years of socialist  government rejected by many voters as scandal ridden and inept. With  FIDESZ winning 52 percent of the vote, Hungary has the distinction of  being the only country in Central Europe since the 1989 transformations  where a single party has won an outright majority--not necessarily a  bad thing, especially in a region where many governments are  periodically hobbled by factionalism.   Those elections were also notable because more than 850,000  Hungarians--16 percent of the vote--cast their ballots for Jobbik, an  anti-Semitic, anti-Roma, irredentist party. While Jobbik is an  opposition party, it has clearly and negatively influenced public  policy discourse.   Under Hungary's electoral system, FIDESZ's 52 percent of the vote has  translated into a two-thirds majority of the seats in parliament. The  government of Prime Minister Viktor Orban has used that supermajority  to push through one controversial initiative after another.   One initiative that has generated particularly sharp criticism is  Hungary's new media law. The OSCE Representative on Freedom of the  Media warned it could be used to silence critical media and public  debate, it overly concentrates power in regulatory authorities, and it  harms media freedom. In Ukraine, where democracy has put down only  shallow roots, the Kyiv Post editorialized that ``Hungary's media law  should not come here.''   Another area of concern stems from the government's fixation on  ethnic Hungarian identity and lost empire in ways that can only be seen  as unfriendly by other countries in the region. One of the government's  first acts was to amend Hungary's citizenship law to facilitate the  acquisition of Hungarian citizenship by ethnic Hungarians in other  countries--primarily Romania, Serbia, Slovakia, and Ukraine. This  expansion of citizenship was pushed through even though, in a 2001  statement submitted to the Council of Europe, the Hungarian Government  firmly renounced all aspirations for dual citizenship for ethnic  Hungarians.   In a further escalation of provocative posturing, a few weeks ago  Speaker of the Hungarian Parliament Laszlo Kovar said that military  force to change the borders with Slovakia--a NATO ally--would have been  justified and, in any case, he added, the ethnic Hungarians in Slovakia  are ``ours.''   If one side of the nationalism coin is an excessive fixation on  Hungarian ethnic identity beyond the borders, the other side is  intolerance toward minorities at home. For example, one increasingly  hears the argument, including from government officials, that while the  Holocaust was a 20th-century tragedy for Jews, the worst tragedy for  Hungarians was the 1920 Treaty of Trianon--the treaty that established  the borders for the countries emerging from the defeated Austro- Hungarian Empire.   This comparison is offensive and disturbing. Ethnic Hungarians were  never targeted for extermination or subjected to mass murder by  Trianon. Moreover, this line of argument presents Hungarians and Jews  as mutually exclusive. But more than 400,000 Jews were sent from  Hungary to Auschwitz, and more than 10,000 Jews were shot along the  banks of the Danube--were they not also Hungarian? How could this not  be a tragedy for Hungary?   The government has also used its supermajority to adopt a completely  new Constitution which has been reviewed by the Council of Europe's  Venice Commission on Democracy through Law, a body of judicial experts.   The Venice Commission expressed particular concern with the  requirement that numerous issues can now only be addressed through  supermajority or so-called cardinal laws. In other words, ``The more  policy issues are transferred beyond the powers of simple majority, the  less significance will future elections have and the more possibilities  does a two-thirds majority have of cementing its political preferences  and the country's legal order.''   In short, the Commission concluded, ``the principle of democracy  itself is at risk.''   This combines, by the way, with a court-packing scheme--the expansion  of the size of the Constitutional Court from 11 to 15--and a reduction  of the retirement age for ordinary judges from 70 to 62, which will  reportedly mean 10 percent of all judges will be replaced.   To make exactly clear what he has intended with these reforms, Prime  Minister Orban declared that he wants to tie the hands not only of the  next government, but of the next 10 governments--that is, future  Hungarian governments for the next 40 years.   It is no wonder then that in Freedom House's latest ``Nations in  Transit'' survey, released this week, Hungary had declined in ratings  for civil society, independent media, national democratic governance,  and judicial framework and independence.   Ironically, just as attention shifts to the tantalizing possibility  of democratic reform in the Middle East, the red flags in Budapest keep  multiplying: Transparency International has warned that transferring  the power to appoint the Ombudsman from the parliament to the president  means that he or she will not be independent of the executive. NGOs  have warned that a new draft religion law may result in a number of  religions losing their registration. Restrictions by Hungarian  authorities on pro-Tibet demonstrations during last week's visit to  Budapest of the Chinese Premier were seen as an unnecessary and  heavyhanded limitation of a fundamental liberty. Plans to recall  soldiers and police from retirement so that they may oversee Romani  work battalions have predictably caused alarm.   In 1989, Hungary stood as an inspiration for democracy and human  rights advocates around the globe. Today, I am deeply troubled by the  trends there. I understand that it sometimes takes new governments time  to find their bearings, and I hope that we will see some adjustments in  Budapest. But in the meantime, I hope that other countries looking for  transformative examples will steer clear of this Hungarian model.                            ____________________ 

Thursday, June 2, 2011

Snapped

Seattle attorney charged with keying badly parked cars

Published 10:37 a.m., Wednesday, June 1, 2011
A Seattle attorney accused of keying and leaving threatening notes on improperly parked cars at a downtown parking garage has been charged with malicious mischief.
King County prosecutors claim Ronald Clarke Mattson vandalized at least three cars at Columbia Center, including one parked askew by building security as part of a sting operation.
On March 9, a woman returned to her Ford SUV to find an angry note, written on Washington Athletic Club stationery, left on her windshield. The note’s author – identified by prosecutors as Mattson – suggested the woman “take some parking lessons” and called her an idiot.
Having returned home, the woman realized someone had dragged a key across her car doors, leaving deep scratches, according to charging documents. She contacted Columbia Center security officers, who photographed her car and took custody of the note.
Two days later on March 11, another woman returned to her car in the Columbia Center parking garage to find an angry note on her Volvo station wagon. As in the earlier case, the woman had parked over the stall line.
“Where did you learn how to park, Dweeb!!” the note read, according to charging documents. That note was also penned on Washington Athletic Club stationery.
Seeing that her Volvo had also been keyed, the woman contacted security.
According to charging documents, building security officers hoping to identify the vandal set up a sting operation on March 15. Security officers parked a Pontiac sedan improperly in the area of the garage where the other cars had been keyed.
As surveillance officers looked on, Mattson drove his silver Porsche past the “bait” car, stopped and reversed back by the Pontiac, Seattle Detective John Crumb told the court. Mattson then parked and approached the car.
Security officers later told police Mattson was seen scratching the Pontiac, according to the detective’s statement. A security officer then followed Mattson to the elevator, where they rode to his 45th floor office.
After a series of interactions with security and police officers, Mattson and his attorney met with investigators to discuss the incidents, Crumb said in court documents. The detective claimed Mattson admitted to the vandalism, which prompted about $6,150 worth of repairs.
“Mattson accepted full responsibility for his actions, expressed great remorse and vowed to make amends with his victims,” the detective told the court.
Mattson has been charged with second-degree malicious mischief, a felony punishable by up to 60 days in jail. He has not yet entered a plea to the charge.
Check the Seattle 911 crime blog for more Seattle crime news. Visit seattlepi.com's home page for more Seattle news.
Levi Pulkkinen can be reached at 206-448-8348 or levipulkkinen@seattlepi.com. Follow Levi on Twitter at twitter.com/levipulk.




Friday, May 27, 2011

Hackers broke into Lockheed Martin networks: source


Hackers broke into Lockheed Martin networks: source

Other U.S. military contractors' networks also may have been hacked


By Jim Finkle and Andrea Shalal-Esa

updated 5/27/2011 8:18:35 PM ET





Unknown hackers have broken into the security networks of Lockheed Martin Corp and several other U.S. military contractors, a source with direct knowledge of the attacks told Reuters.
They breached security systems designed to keep out intruders by creating duplicates to "SecurID" electronic keys from EMC Corp's RSA security division, said the person who was not authorized to publicly discuss the matter.
It was not immediately clear what kind of data, if any, was stolen by the hackers. But the networks of Lockheed and other military contractors contain sensitive data on future weapons systems as well as military technology currently used in battles in Iraq and Afghanistan.
Weapons makers are the latest companies to be breached through sophisticated attacks that have pierced the defenses of huge corporations including Sony, Google Inc and EMC Corp. Security experts say that it is virtually impossible for any company or government agency to build a security network that hackers will be unable to penetrate.
The Pentagon, which has about 85,000 military personnel and civilians working on cybersecurity issues worldwide, said it also uses a limited number of the RSA electronic security keys, but declined to say how many for security reasons.
The hackers learned how to copy the security keys with data stolen from RSA during a sophisticated attack that EMC disclosed in March, according to the source.
EMC declined to comment on the matter, as did executives at major defense contractors.
Rick Moy, president of NSS Labs, an information security company, said the original attack on RSA was likely targeted at its customers, including military, financial, governmental and other organizations with critical intellectual property.
He said the initial RSA attack was followed by malware and phishing campaigns seeking specific data that would link tokens to end-users, which meant the current attacks may have been carried out by the same hackers.
"Given the military targets, and that millions of compromised keys are in circulation, this is not over," he said.
Lockheed, which employs 126,000 people worldwide and had $45.8 billion in revenue last year, said it does not discuss specific threats or responses as a matter of principle, but regularly took actions to counter threats and ensure security.
"We have policies and procedures in place to mitigate the cyber threats to our business, and we remain confident in the integrity of our robust, multi-layered information systems security," said Lockheed spokesman Jeffery Adams.
Executives at General Dynamics Corp ,, Boeing Co , Northrop Grumman Corp, Raytheon Co and other defense companies declined to comment on any security breaches linked to the RSA products.
"We do not comment on whether or not Northrop Grumman is or has been a target for cyber intrusions," said Northrop spokesman Randy Belote.
Actions prevented widespread disruption
Raytheon spokesman Jonathan Kasle said his company took immediate companywide actions in March when incident information was initially provided to RSA customers.
"As a result of these actions, we prevented a widespread disruption of our network," he said.
Boeing spokesman Todd Kelley said his company had a "wide range" of systems in place to detect and prevent intrusions of its networks. "We have a robust computing security team that constantly monitors our network," he said.
Defense contractors' networks contain sensitive data on sophisticated weapons systems, but all classified information is kept on separate, closed networks managed by the U.S. government, said a former senior defense official, who was not authorized to speak on the record.
SecurIDs are widely used electronic keys to computer systems that work using a two-pronged approach to confirming the identity of the person trying to access a computer system. They are designed to thwart hackers who might use key-logging viruses to capture passwords by constantly generating new passwords to enter the system.
The SecurID generates new strings of digits on a minute-by-minute basis that the user must enter along with a secret PIN (personal identification number) before they can access the network. If the user fails to enter the string before it expires, then access is denied.
RSA and other companies have produced a total of about 250 million security tokens, although it is not clear how many are in use worldwide at present, said the former defense official.
The devices provided additional security at a lower cost than biometrics such as fingerprint readers or iris scanning machines, said the official, noting that the RSA incident could increase demand for greater use of biometric devices.
The RSA breach did raise concerns about any security tokens that had been compromised, and EMC now faced tough questions about whether "they can repair that product line or whether they need to ditch it and start over again," he said.
EMC disclosed in March that hackers had broken into its network and stolen some information related to its SecurIDs. It said the information could potentially be used to reduce the effectiveness of those devices in securing customer networks.
EMC said it worked with the Department of Homeland Security to publish a note on the March attack, providing Web addresses to help firms identify where the attack might have come from.
It briefed individual customers on how to secure their systems. In a bid to ensure secrecy, the company required them to sign nondisclosure agreements promising not to discuss the advice that it provided in those sessions, according to two people familiar with the briefings.








Thursday, May 26, 2011

China military admits cyberwarfare unit exists - Technology & science - Security - msnbc.com

China military admits cyberwarfare unit exists - Technology & science - Security - msnbc.com



China military admits cyberwarfare unit exists
The government says it exists to protect Chinese networks from attacks
5/26/2011 

The Chinese military has established a cyberwarfare unit to protect Chinese networks from
external attacks, a military spokesperson admitted in a news conference Wednesday.

The elite cyberwarfare unit of the People's Liberation Army (PLA) is called the "Online Blue Army," the
People's Daily Online reported. It is tasked with enhancing Chinese troops' military training and network
security, Ministry of National Defense spokesman Senior Colonel Geng Yansheng said.


"Currently, China's network protection is comparatively weak," Geng said. "Enhancing the informationization level and strengthening network security protection are important components of military training for an army."


China's suspected participation in recent high-profile cyberattacks against, among others, Google, Morgan Stanley and DuPont, however, have security experts doubting the intentions of the PLA's "Blue Army."

George Smith, senior fellow at GlobalSecurity.org, told SecurityNewsDaily the creation of the
elite military unit "offers a resource" for more Chinese-borne cyberattacks. Establishing a
cyberwarfare military unit, Smith added, "provides a piece of convenient rationalization" for other
nations to create similar teams.
Although yesterday's announcement was the first official acknowledgement of the unit, the PLA
Daily revealed that a military "Internet operation team" had conducted exercises in China's Guangzhou
Military Region in late April, Focus Taiwan reported.


During these drills, the teams "launched multiple attacks on imaginary enemies by releasing huge
amounts of useless documents and viruses to try to paralyze the enemies' computer systems and to
steal information from them," according to Focus Taiwan.